From 29fa8c74c82665d1194880fa48ffb6283aaf64c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Fehlner Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 10:31:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix(CBOM): use consistent 'lifecycle' spelling 'life cycle' -> 'lifecycle', the spelling used everywhere else in the guide (21 occurrences in 0x30-Anatomy-of-a-CBOM alone). Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Fehlner --- CBOM/en/0x20-Use-Cases.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/CBOM/en/0x20-Use-Cases.md b/CBOM/en/0x20-Use-Cases.md index 709ed643..c11da1c8 100644 --- a/CBOM/en/0x20-Use-Cases.md +++ b/CBOM/en/0x20-Use-Cases.md @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ in an automated way. ## Identify Expiring and Long-Term Cryptographic Material An RSA certificate expiring in one week poses less cryptographic risk than the same certificate expiring in 20 years. Service downtime due to an expired certificate is another risk to be considered. Therefore, we argue that an inventory -that captures the life cycle of cryptographic material as allowed by CBOM gives context to an inventory that is +that captures the lifecycle of cryptographic material as allowed by CBOM gives context to an inventory that is instrumental for managing cryptographic risk. ## Ensure Cryptographic Certifications