-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
OpenTransportMode and Submode #853
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
change-requestRequest for an additional feature -- Must be discussed with the groupRequest for an additional feature -- Must be discussed with the groupgroup_decision_neededMust be discussed during a CEN TC278 WG3 SG9 plenaryMust be discussed during a CEN TC278 WG3 SG9 plenaryneeds documentation updateThe NeTEx document needs to be updatedThe NeTEx document needs to be updated
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Labels
change-requestRequest for an additional feature -- Must be discussed with the groupRequest for an additional feature -- Must be discussed with the groupgroup_decision_neededMust be discussed during a CEN TC278 WG3 SG9 plenaryMust be discussed during a CEN TC278 WG3 SG9 plenaryneeds documentation updateThe NeTEx document needs to be updatedThe NeTEx document needs to be updated
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Looking at the code for OpenTransportMode and Submode, they look identical to me.
In addition, both contain, via TransportModeGroup, both TransportMode of type AllModesEnumeration and AllSubmodeChoiceGroup - i.e., they can represent both modes and submodes.
Is this as it as intended, or should OpenTrasportMode and Submode be splitted to only contain AllModesEnumeration or AllSubmodeChoiceGroup respectively?