From 9dcc6b4d36382408447ad10f6de75e978689487f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PandaeDo Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 14:08:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] remove doubled questions, combine feature&comp --- .../features/feature_name/index.rst | 1 - .../feature_safety_analysis_fdr.rst | 188 ---------- .../safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst | 352 ++++++++---------- .../platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst | 75 ++-- .../guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst | 3 +- 5 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 426 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/safety_analysis/feature_safety_analysis_fdr.rst diff --git a/process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/index.rst b/process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/index.rst index 048ced8a2f..44d8a2bc47 100644 --- a/process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/index.rst +++ b/process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/index.rst @@ -184,6 +184,5 @@ Footnotes requirements/chklst_req_inspection.rst safety_analysis/fmea.rst safety_analysis/dfa.rst - safety_analysis/feature_safety_analysis_fdr.rst safety_planning/index.rst security_planning/index.rst diff --git a/process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/safety_analysis/feature_safety_analysis_fdr.rst b/process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/safety_analysis/feature_safety_analysis_fdr.rst deleted file mode 100644 index c31e3675fb..0000000000 --- a/process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/safety_analysis/feature_safety_analysis_fdr.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,188 +0,0 @@ -.. - # ******************************************************************************* - # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation - # - # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional - # information regarding copyright ownership. - # - # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the - # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at - # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 - # - # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 - # ******************************************************************************* - - -Safety Analysis Checklist -========================= - -.. document:: [Your Feature Name] Safety Analysis Checklist - :id: doc__feature_name_safety_analysis_fdr - :status: draft - :safety: ASIL_B - :security: YES - :realizes: wp__fdr_reports - :tags: template - -.. attention:: - The above directive must be updated according to your Feature. - - - Modify ``Your Feature Name`` to be your Feature Name - - Modify ``id`` to be your Feature Name in lower snake case preceded by ``doc__`` and followed by ``_safety _analysis_fdr`` - - Adjust ``status`` to be ``valid`` - - Adjust ``safety``, ``security`` and ``tags`` according to your needs - - -**Purpose** - -The purpose of this Safety Analysis (DFA and FMEA) checklist template is to collect the topics to be checked during verification of the Safety Analysis. - -**Conduct** - -As described in :need:`wf__p_formal_rv`, the formal document review is performed by an "external" safety manager: - -- reviewer: - -**Checklist** - -Please note that the "passed" column must contain "yes" or "no" for each checklist item. Additionally, the remarks column must explain why item passed or did not passed. In case of "no" an issue link to the issue tracking system has to be added in the last column. See also :ref:`review_concept` for further information about reviews in general and inspection in particular. - -.. list-table:: General Checklist - :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 - - * - ID - - Safety analysis activity - - Compliant to ISO 26262? - - Reference - - Comment - - * - 1 - - Are the safety analysis performed according to the defined process and templates? See :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` and also :ref:`FMEA_templates` and :ref:`dfa_templates` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 2 - - Is the result of the safety analysis indicate if the safety requirements are complied? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 3 - - Are for all not complied safety requirements mitigations defined to resolute the non-compliance? The mitigations shall have a direct influence on the violation by prevention, detection or mitigation to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 4 - - Are the mitigations effective and implemented? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 5 - - Are newly identified hazards adressed to be considered in HARA in the safety manual? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 6 - - Are additional safety-related test cases determined by potential results of the safety analyses? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - -.. list-table:: DFA Checklist - :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 - - * - ID - - Safety analysis activity - - Compliant to ISO 26262? - - Reference - - Comment - - * - 1 - - Are the potential dependent failures identified by performming a DFA? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 2 - - Is it plausible that each potential identified dependent failure that has been identified, will lead to a dependent failure which cause a violation of FFI? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 3 - - Are applicable operational situations and operating modes considered? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 4 - - Are the failure initiators :need:`[[title]] ` suitable and applied? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 5 - - Is a rationale provided for each identified potential dependent failure? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 6 - - Are measures defined to resolute the identified potential dependent failures? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 7 - - Can be the required level of independence shown for the identified potential dependent failures? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 8 - - Are the templates for DFA used? See :ref:`dfa_templates` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 9 - - Is the DFA performed in a systematic way to identify the potential dependent failures and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - -.. list-table:: FMEA Checklist - :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 - - * - ID - - Safety analysis activity - - Compliant to ISO 26262? - - Reference - - Comment - - * - 1 - - Are the fault models suitable and applied for the FMEA? See :ref:`fault_models` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 2 - - Is the FMEA performed in a systmatic way to identify the potential failure modes and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 3 - - Are the templates for FMEA used? See :ref:`FMEA_templates` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - diff --git a/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst b/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst index 18f08bf852..ca32c6037a 100644 --- a/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst +++ b/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst @@ -1,189 +1,163 @@ -.. - # ******************************************************************************* - # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation - # - # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional - # information regarding copyright ownership. - # - # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the - # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at - # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 - # - # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 - # ******************************************************************************* - - -Safety Analysis Checklist -========================= - -.. document:: [Your Module Name] Safety Analysis Checklist - :id: doc__module_name_safety_analysis_fdr - :status: draft - :safety: ASIL_B - :security: YES - :realizes: wp__fdr_reports - :tags: template - -.. attention:: - The above directive must be updated according to your Module. - - - Modify ``Your Module Name`` to be your Module Name - - Modify ``id`` to be your Module Name in lower snake case preceded by ``doc__`` and followed by ``_safety _analysis_fdr`` - - Adjust ``status`` to be ``valid`` - - Adjust ``safety``, ``security`` and ``tags`` according to your needs - - -**Purpose** - -The purpose of this Safety Analysis (DFA and FMEA) checklist template is to collect the topics to be checked during verification of the Safety Analysis. - -**Conduct** - -As described in :need:`wf__p_formal_rv`, the formal document review is performed by an "external" safety manager: - -- reviewer: - -**Checklist** - -Please note that the "passed" column must contain "yes" or "no" for each checklist item. Additionally, the remarks column must explain why item passed or did not passed. In case of "no" an issue link to the issue tracking system has to be added in the last column. See also :ref:`review_concept` for further information about reviews in general and inspection in particular. - - -.. list-table:: General Checklist - :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 - - * - ID - - Safety analysis activity - - Compliant to ISO 26262? - - Reference - - Comment - - * - 1 - - Are the safety analysis performed according to the defined process and templates? See :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` and also :ref:`FMEA_templates` and :ref:`dfa_templates` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 2 - - Is the result of the safety analysis indicate if the safety requirements are complied? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 3 - - Are for all not complied safety requirements mitigations defined to resolute the non-compliance? The mitigations shall have a direct influence on the violation by prevention, detection or mitigation to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 4 - - Are the mitigations effective and implemented? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 5 - - Are newly identified hazards adressed to be considered in HARA in the safety manual? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 6 - - Are additional safety-related test cases determined by potential results of the safety analyses? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - -.. list-table:: DFA Checklist - :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 - - * - ID - - Safety analysis activity - - Compliant to ISO 26262? - - Reference - - Comment - - * - 1 - - Are the potential dependent failures identified by performming a DFA? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 2 - - Is it plausible that each potential identified dependent failure that has been identified, will lead to a dependent failure which cause a violation of FFI? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 3 - - Are applicable operational situations and operating modes considered? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 4 - - Are the failure initiators :need:`[[title]] ` suitable and applied? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 5 - - Is a rationale provided for each identified potential dependent failure? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 6 - - Are measures defined to resolute the identified potential dependent failures? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 7 - - Can be the required level of independence shown for the identified potential dependent failures? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 8 - - Are the templates for DFA used? See :ref:`dfa_templates` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 9 - - Is the DFA performed in a systematic way to identify the potential dependent failures and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - -.. list-table:: FMEA Checklist - :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 - - * - ID - - Safety analysis activity - - Compliant to ISO 26262? - - Reference - - Comment - - * - 1 - - Are the fault models suitable and applied for the FMEA? See :ref:`fault_models` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 2 - - Is the FMEA performed in a systmatic way to identify the potential failure modes and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 3 - - Are the templates for FMEA used? See :ref:`FMEA_templates` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - +.. + # ******************************************************************************* + # Copyright (c) 2026 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation + # + # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional + # information regarding copyright ownership. + # + # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the + # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at + # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + # + # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 + # ******************************************************************************* + + +Module Safety Analysis Formal Review Report +============================================= + +.. document:: Module Safety Analysis Formal Review Report + :id: doc__module_safety_analysis_fdr + :status: draft + :safety: ASIL_B + :security: YES + :realizes: wp__fdr_reports + :tags: template + + + +**Purpose** +The purpose of this Safety Analysis (DFA and FMEA) formal review report template is to collect the topics to be checked during verification of the Module Safety Analysis. + +**Conduct** +As described in :need:`wf__p_formal_rv`, the formal document review is performed by an "external" safety manager: + +- reviewer: **** +- scope: **** + +**Checklist** + +Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "no" for each checklist item and additional to add in the remarks why it is passed or not passed. In case of "no" an issue link to the issue tracking system has to be added in the last column. See also :ref:`review_concept` for further information about reviews in general and inspection in particular. + + +.. list-table:: General Checklist + :header-rows: 1 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 + + * - ID + - Safety analysis activity + - Compliant to ISO 26262? + - Reference + - Comment + + * - Gen 1 + - Are the safety analysis performed according to the defined process and templates? See :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` and also :ref:`FMEA_templates` and :ref:`dfa_templates` + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - Gen 2 + - Are the safety analysis performed in a systematic way to identify the potential dependent failures / failure modes and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - Gen 3 + - Is the result of the safety analysis indicate if the safety requirements are complied? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - Gen 4 + - Are the mitigations effective and implemented? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - Gen 5 + - Are all AoU's that are used as mitigation's created and covered in the safety manual? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - Gen 6 + - Are additional safety-related test cases determined by potential results of the safety analyses? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + +.. list-table:: DFA Checklist + :header-rows: 1 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 + + * - ID + - Safety analysis activity + - Compliant to ISO 26262? + - Reference + - Comment + + * - DFA 1 + - Are the potential dependent failures identified by performming a DFA? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - DFA 2 + - Is it plausible that each potential identified dependent failure that has been identified, will lead to a dependent failure which cause a violation of FFI? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - DFA 3 + - Are applicable operational situations and operating modes considered? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - DFA 4 + - Are the failure initiators :need:`[[title]] ` suitable and applied? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - DFA 5 + - Is a rationale provided for each identified potential dependent failure? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - DFA 6 + - Are measures defined to resolve the identified potential dependent failures? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - DFA 7 + - Can be the required level of independence shown for the identified potential dependent failures? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + +.. list-table:: FMEA Checklist + :header-rows: 1 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 + + * - ID + - Safety analysis activity + - Compliant to ISO 26262? + - Reference + - Comment + + * - FMEA 1 + - Are the fault models suitable and applied for the FMEA? See :ref:`fault_models` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - + + * - FMEA 2 + - Are measures defined to resolve the identified faults? + - [YES | NO ] + - :need:`[[title]] ` + - diff --git a/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst b/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst index af2725f07d..a0d92a44f9 100644 --- a/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst +++ b/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ The purpose of this Safety Analysis (DFA and FMEA) formal review report template As described in :need:`wf__p_formal_rv`, the formal document review is performed by an "external" safety manager: - reviewer: **** +- scope: **** **Checklist** @@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n .. list-table:: General Checklist :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 * - ID - Safety analysis activity @@ -49,37 +50,37 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n - Reference - Comment - * - 1 + * - Gen 1 - Are the safety analysis performed according to the defined process and templates? See :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` and also :ref:`FMEA_templates` and :ref:`dfa_templates` - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` + - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 2 - - Is the result of the safety analysis indicate if the safety requirements are complied? + * - Gen 2 + - Are the safety analysis performed in a systematic way to identify the potential dependent failures / failure modes and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` + - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 3 - - Are for all not complied safety requirements mitigations defined to resolute the non-compliance? The mitigations shall have a direct influence on the violation by prevention, detection or mitigation to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. + * - Gen 3 + - Is the result of the safety analysis indicate if the safety requirements are complied? - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` + - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 4 + * - Gen 4 - Are the mitigations effective and implemented? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 5 - - Are newly identified hazards adressed to be considered in HARA in the safety manual? + * - Gen 5 + - Are all AoU's that are used as mitigation's created and covered in the safety manual? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 6 + * - Gen 6 - Are additional safety-related test cases determined by potential results of the safety analyses? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` @@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n .. list-table:: DFA Checklist :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 * - ID - Safety analysis activity @@ -96,64 +97,52 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n - Reference - Comment - * - 1 + * - DFA 1 - Are the potential dependent failures identified by performming a DFA? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 2 + * - DFA 2 - Is it plausible that each potential identified dependent failure that has been identified, will lead to a dependent failure which cause a violation of FFI? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 3 + * - DFA 3 - Are applicable operational situations and operating modes considered? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 4 + * - DFA 4 - Are the failure initiators :need:`[[title]] ` suitable and applied? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 5 + * - DFA 5 - Is a rationale provided for each identified potential dependent failure? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 6 - - Are measures defined to resolute the identified potential dependent failures? + * - DFA 6 + - Are measures defined to resolve the identified potential dependent failures? - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` + - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 7 + * - DFA 7 - Can be the required level of independence shown for the identified potential dependent failures? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 8 - - Are the templates for DFA used? See :ref:`dfa_templates` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 9 - - Is the DFA performed in a systematic way to identify the potential dependent failures and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - .. list-table:: FMEA Checklist :header-rows: 1 - :widths: 10,10,30,30,20 + :widths: 10,30,10,30,20 * - ID - Safety analysis activity @@ -161,20 +150,14 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n - Reference - Comment - * - 1 + * - FMEA 1 - Are the fault models suitable and applied for the FMEA? See :ref:`fault_models` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] ` - - * - 2 - - Is the FMEA performed in a systmatic way to identify the potential failure modes and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? + * - FMEA 2 + - Are measures defined to resolve the identified faults? - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] ` - - - - * - 3 - - Are the templates for FMEA used? See :ref:`FMEA_templates` and also :ref:`process_requirements_safety_analysis` - - [YES | NO ] - - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` + - :need:`[[title]] ` - diff --git a/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst b/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst index 13754aafe7..80b9074ff6 100644 --- a/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst +++ b/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst @@ -26,5 +26,4 @@ Safety Analysis Checklist For the content see here: - :need:`doc__platform_safety_analysis_fdr` (platform) - - :need:`doc__feature_name_safety_analysis_fdr` (feature) - - :need:`doc__module_name_safety_analysis_fdr` (module) + - :need:`doc__module_safety_analysis_fdr` (feature) From 8a71a67611ca67ae0ffab98d7a8bcae985414e4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PandaeDo Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 14:11:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] add general answer --- .../module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst | 2 +- .../platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst b/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst index ca32c6037a..560a9f8866 100644 --- a/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst +++ b/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n - Are the safety analysis performed in a systematic way to identify the potential dependent failures / failure modes and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - + - * - Gen 3 - Is the result of the safety analysis indicate if the safety requirements are complied? diff --git a/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst b/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst index a0d92a44f9..36b1c449bc 100644 --- a/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst +++ b/process/folder_templates/platform/docs/safety_mgt/platform_safety_analysis_fdr.rst @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Please note that it is mandatory to fill in the "passed" column with "yes" or "n - Are the safety analysis performed in a systematic way to identify the potential dependent failures / failure modes and their effects? Are the failure effect and the mitigation described? - [YES | NO ] - :need:`[[title]] `, :need:`[[title]] ` - - + - * - Gen 3 - Is the result of the safety analysis indicate if the safety requirements are complied? From 4f4f157d384b2cf22ed3074b377361fe4298d17c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PandaeDo Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 15:41:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] fix review findings --- .../docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst | 8 ++++---- .../guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst b/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst index 560a9f8866..613356b943 100644 --- a/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst +++ b/process/folder_templates/modules/module_name/docs/safety_mgt/module_safety_analysis_fdr.rst @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ # ******************************************************************************* -Module Safety Analysis Formal Review Report -============================================= +Safety Analysis Formal Review Report +==================================== -.. document:: Module Safety Analysis Formal Review Report +.. document:: Safety Analysis Formal Review Report :id: doc__module_safety_analysis_fdr :status: draft :safety: ASIL_B @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Module Safety Analysis Formal Review Report **Purpose** -The purpose of this Safety Analysis (DFA and FMEA) formal review report template is to collect the topics to be checked during verification of the Module Safety Analysis. +The purpose of this Safety Analysis (DFA and FMEA) formal review report template is to collect the topics to be checked during verification of the Safety Analysis. **Conduct** As described in :need:`wf__p_formal_rv`, the formal document review is performed by an "external" safety manager: diff --git a/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst b/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst index 80b9074ff6..882673825f 100644 --- a/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst +++ b/process/process_areas/safety_analysis/guidance/safety_analysis_checklist.rst @@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ Safety Analysis Checklist For the content see here: - :need:`doc__platform_safety_analysis_fdr` (platform) - - :need:`doc__module_safety_analysis_fdr` (feature) + - :need:`doc__module_safety_analysis_fdr` (module)