[codex] Drop unused channel devices owner org index#2337
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR removes the ChangesIndex Removal
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsGit: Failed to clone repository. Please run the Comment |
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing Footnotes
|
1e902bb to
1a083a2
Compare
|
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |



Summary (AI generated)
public.finx_channel_devices_owner_org.channel_devices.owner_orgindex only.Motivation (AI generated)
Live index stats showed
finx_channel_devices_owner_orghad only a handful of scans after thechannel_devicesreindex, and code search found runtime query paths useapp_id,device_id, orchannel_idinstead ofowner_orgas a leading lookup.Business Impact (AI generated)
This removes a low-value index from a churn-heavy table, reducing write overhead and keeping database maintenance focused on the indexes used by customer-facing channel/device flows.
Test Plan (AI generated)
bun run lint:backend.bun run lint.bun typecheck.bunx supabase migration list --linkedand confirmed this migration is the only local pending migration.Screenshots (AI generated)
Not applicable. Database migration only.
Checklist (AI generated)
bun run lint:backend && bun run lint.Generated with AI
Summary by CodeRabbit