Skip to content

Manchester | 26-ITP-Jan | Ofonime Edak | Sprint 1 | Data group#1045

Open
Ofonimeedak wants to merge 5 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
Ofonimeedak:datagroup/sprint1-coursework
Open

Manchester | 26-ITP-Jan | Ofonime Edak | Sprint 1 | Data group#1045
Ofonimeedak wants to merge 5 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
Ofonimeedak:datagroup/sprint1-coursework

Conversation

@Ofonimeedak
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Self checklist

  • I have titled my PR with Region | Cohort | FirstName LastName | Sprint | Assignment Title
  • My changes meet the requirements of the task
  • I have tested my changes
  • My changes follow the style guide

Changelist

I have made changes to the following files, sum.js,include.js and all test cases
I have followed the acceptance criteria for all katas
This PR contains functions for de-duplication and summation of arrays
It also contained a refactored function and different test cases

@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added 📅 Sprint 1 Assigned during Sprint 1 of this module Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. Module-Data-Groups The name of the module. labels Mar 19, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cjyuan cjyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not practice "committing files one by one, on purpose, and for a reason"?
In VSCode, you can select which file to stage, and commit only the staged file.
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5jZ9lrSpqk&t=705 (At around 12:50 minute marker, the video shows how to stage a single file).

Comment on lines +47 to +52
[{ input: [0.5, 0.2, 0.11, 0.89, 0.3], expected: 2 }].forEach(
({ input, expected }) =>
it(`should return ${expected} for [${input}]`, () => {
expect(sum(input)).toEqual(expected);
})
);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Decimal numbers in most programming languages (including JS) are internally represented in "floating point number" format. Floating point arithmetic is not exact. For example, the result of 46.5678 - 46 === 0.5678 is false because 46.5678 - 46 only yield a value that is very close to 0.5678. Even changing the order in which the program add/subtract numbers can yield different values.

So the following could happen

  expect( 1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 ).toEqual( 1.805 );                // This fail
  expect( 1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 ).toEqual( 1.8049999999999997 );   // This pass
  expect( 0.005 + 0.6 + 1.2 ).toEqual( 1.8049999999999997 );   // This fail

  console.log(1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 == 1.805);  // false
  console.log(1.2 + 0.6 + 0.005 == 0.005 + 0.6 + 1.2); // false

Can you find a more appropriate way to test a value (that involves decimal number calculations) for equality?

Suggestion: Look up

  • Checking equality in floating point arithmetic in JavaScript
  • Checking equality in floating point arithmetic with Jest

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this. I have read about the matchers for numbers and floats now

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any change made to the relevant Jest test.

// Then it should ignore the non-numerical values and return the sum of the numerical elements

[
{ input: ["evan", 3, "mike", 20, 6, "", "/", , , 20], expected: 49 },
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to explicitly specify undefined instead of leaving the element blank.

@cjyuan cjyuan added Reviewed Volunteer to add when completing a review with trainee action still to take. and removed Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. labels Mar 19, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak requested a review from cjyuan March 28, 2026 05:32
Comment on lines +3 to +10
if (elements.every((e) => typeof e === "string")) return -Infinity;
const number = [];
for (let i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {
if (typeof elements[i] === "number" && !Number.isNaN(elements[i])) {
number.push(elements[i]);
}
}
if (number.length === 0) return -Infinity;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code works better without line 3. Can you figure out why?

@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak added the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
@Ofonimeedak Ofonimeedak requested a review from cjyuan March 28, 2026 15:06
Comment on lines +20 to +24
[{ input: [], expected: [] }].forEach(({ input, expected }) =>
it(`given an empty array, it returns an empty array [${input}]`, () => {
expect(dedupe(input)).not.toBe(expected);
})
);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check is not checking if the return value is an empty array.

Comment on lines +35 to +37
it(`should return same input values [${input}] without duplicate`, () => {
expect(dedupe(input)).toStrictEqual(expected);
})
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check cannot check if the function is returning a different array.

Comment on lines +57 to +61
[{ input: [1, 1, 2], expected: [1, 2] }].forEach(({ input, expected }) =>
it("returns a copy not the original array", () => {
expect(dedupe(input)).toStrictEqual(expected);
})
);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This check is not checking if the function is returning a copy of the original array or not.

@cjyuan cjyuan removed the Needs Review Trainee to add when requesting review. PRs without this label will not be reviewed. label Mar 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Module-Data-Groups The name of the module. Reviewed Volunteer to add when completing a review with trainee action still to take. 📅 Sprint 1 Assigned during Sprint 1 of this module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants