Skip to content

Auto-activate java easy wins for asm-libraries#6932

Open
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
easy-win/asm-libraries/java
Open

Auto-activate java easy wins for asm-libraries#6932
dd-octo-sts[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
easy-win/asm-libraries/java

Conversation

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 14, 2026

Automated activation of easy-win tests for java owned by asm-libraries
View nightly workflow run

  • If you approve this PR please also merge it.
  • If the tests are failing it might be due to a change made since the last nightly system-tests run. You can close the PR, an updated one will be available tomorrow.
  • If you close the PR please also delete the branch

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot requested review from a team as code owners May 14, 2026 07:00
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot enabled auto-merge (squash) May 14, 2026 07:00
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

manifests/java.yml                                                      @DataDog/asm-java @DataDog/apm-java

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bf7a20727c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread manifests/java.yml
tests/ai_guard/test_ai_guard_sdk.py::Test_AIGuardEvent_Tag: missing_feature (APPSEC-62215)
tests/ai_guard/test_ai_guard_sdk.py::Test_AIGuardEvent_Tag: # TODO: a lower version might be supported
- declaration: missing_feature (APPSEC-62215)
component_version: <1.62.0
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Quote special-character version range values

This manifest entry violates the repository review rule that values containing < must be quoted (.cursor/rules/pr-review.mdc, rule 10). Leaving component_version unquoted here can cause inconsistent parsing/validation across YAML tooling and CI checks even if local parsing happens to work, so this should be written as a quoted string (for example '<1.62.0').

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2
Copy link
Copy Markdown

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented May 14, 2026

Tests

Fix all issues with BitsAI or with Cursor

⚠️ Warnings

🧪 1 Test failed

tests.appsec.test_blocking_addresses.Test_Blocking_request_body_filenames.test_blocking[akka-http] from system_tests_suite   View in Datadog   (Fix with Cursor)
ValueError: No appsec event validate this condition

self = <tests.appsec.test_blocking_addresses.Test_Blocking_request_body_filenames object at 0x7f2108584260>

    def test_blocking(self):
        """Can block on server.request.body.filenames"""
>       interfaces.library.assert_waf_attack(self.rbf_req, rule="tst-037-014")

tests/appsec/test_blocking_addresses.py:606: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
...

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: bf7a207 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants