Repository navigation
fix(storage-cassandra): consistently apply LWT to affected table-columns #389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jcshepherd
merged 7 commits into
feat/storage-cassandra-in-tree
from
fix/cassandra-lwt-paxos-corruption
Oct 8, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
42eca0f
fix(storage-cassandra): consistently apply LWT to affected table-columns
jcshepherd 8d8b9e4
chore(storage-cassandra) - forgotten cargo fmt
jcshepherd e7fc4c7
fix(storage-cassandra/tests): retry OCC on 'TransactionConflict' erro…
jcshepherd 653d3f4
test(storage-cassandra): ignoring one TTL that seems susceptible to a…
jcshepherd 812b7ec
test(cassandra-storage): temporarily ignoring failures in ttl_integra…
jcshepherd abb522d
ci(storage-cassandra): drop redundant --rust from cassandra-rust job
jcshepherd 1b24cdf
fix(storage-cassandra): address PR389 review feedback
jcshepherd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This has a similar shape to the update_table change, in that the stream_label LWT and the shard insert batch are now independent, and the
[applied]result of the LWT is not checked. If the shard batch fails after the label is written, ListStreams would report a stream from the catalog label while DescribeStream finds no shards for it. Could consider checking the applied result and, on batch failure, clearing the label so the two stay consistent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed.