Skip to content

Promote macOS signing-order correction for stable 1.0.4 - #1431

Merged
Kief5555 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dev
Nov 8, 2026
Merged

Kief5555 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
dev

Conversation

@Kief5555

@Kief5555 Kief5555 commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fix the Intel packaging failure by signing nested helpers before the root app. Main-executable architecture checks, entitlements, Developer ID verification, notarization, and package acceptance remain in place.

Only packaging Python and its regression tests change. A real unsigned Intel app reproduces the old failure and passes deep, strict signing checks with this correction. Local macOS tests passed (33 passed, one platform skip), 24 workflow contracts passed, and shared packaging/workflow/localization CI passed. Independent peer review found no issues. Platform CI continues; the new production build and stable publication retain their full gates.

Promotes #1430 for a fresh 1.0.4 stable release build. The previous build failed Intel signing after all application tests passed.

@Kief5555
Kief5555 merged commit bf8726b into main Nov 8, 2026
8 checks passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-08T21:17:00.443453Z 3cbe315 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant