Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency pytest-asyncio to v1.4.1.post1 - #210

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/pytest-asyncio-1.x
Open

renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/pytest-asyncio-1.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change OpenSSF
pytest-asyncio (changelog) dependency-groups patch ==1.4.0 → ==1.4.1.post1 OpenSSF Scorecard

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest-asyncio (pytest-asyncio)

v1.4.1.post1: pytest-asyncio v1.4.1.post1

Compare Source

1.4.1.post1 - 2026-11-01
Changed
  • Removed the upper version bound on the pytest dependency. (#​1605)

v1.4.1: pytest-asyncio v1.4.1

Compare Source

1.4.1 - 2026-10-25

Added

  • Declared support for Python 3.15 (#​1588)

Fixed

  • Allow AsyncIterable as a return type for asynchronous generator fixtures decorated with pytest_asyncio.fixture (#​1090)

Notes for Downstream Packagers

  • Source-tree development dependencies now use PEP 735 dependency groups and uv.lock. (#​1518)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Berlin)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/pytest-asyncio-1.x branch from 997c30d to 5999df7 Compare November 6, 2026 00:47
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency pytest-asyncio to v1.4.1 chore(deps): update dependency pytest-asyncio to v1.4.1.post1 Nov 6, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants