Skip to content

Update dependency hono to v4.13.18 - #2428

Open
tryghost-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/hono-4.x
Open

tryghost-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/hono-4.x

Conversation

@tryghost-renovate

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
hono (source) 4.13.17 → 4.13.18 age confidence

Release Notes

honojs/hono (hono)

v4.13.18

Compare Source

Security fixes

This release includes fixes for the following security issues:

validator() skips validation for requests whose Content-Type parameters are formatted differently

Affects: validator('json') and validator('form') in hono/validator. A Content-Type with whitespace before ;, a trailing ;, or an unusual parameter name was not recognized, so the validator saw an empty object while the handler could read all fields. This completes the fix for GHSA-4h7h-rv7c-7m2v. The validator now decides by the media type alone, as c.req.parseBody() does. GHSA-92p4-j3wq-jmqx

bodyLimit() keeps every transfer chunk of a request body in memory

Affects: bodyLimit() in hono/body-limit. A body sent in very small transfer chunks was retained as one object per chunk, so a request within the configured limit could exhaust memory. The body is now buffered in one array bounded by maxSize. GHSA-39q9-qp46-w8xg

mount() and app.mount() forward a wrong path when a custom getPath adds a prefix

Affects: mount() in hono/mount and app.mount() on 4.13.16 and 4.13.17. With a getPath that prepends a prefix such as the host name, one segment too many was removed from the forwarded path, so middleware scoped inside the mount prefix could be skipped. The prefix is removed from the routed path again. Paths that would change meaning when forwarded now get 400, and an optional regular expression parameter in a mount path throws. GHSA-h25j-2p75-qj33

serveStatic() serves a path that was decoded twice when allowPercentInPath is enabled

Affects: serveStatic() in hono/serve-static and the runtime adapters, only with allowPercentInPath: true. A malformed percent escape in the request path was decoded a second time, so a path that middleware registered on the encoded form did not see could still reach a static file. The file path must now be the same as the routed path, and otherwise the response is 404. GHSA-74fm-fwc7-3fwp


Users who rely on validator(), bodyLimit(), mount() with a custom getPath, or serveStatic() with allowPercentInPath are strongly encouraged to upgrade to this version.

Full Changelog: honojs/hono@v4.13.17...v4.13.18


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Etc/UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • Between 08:00 AM and 03:59 PM, Monday through Thursday (* 8-15 * * 1-4)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate CLI.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration

  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e2a9e29d-397d-41cc-b2cc-55542b1a478a

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
staging — 98f694e3 Deployed Nov 14, 2026 by tryghost-renovate[bot] via deploy-pr / Deploy PR #10534
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants