Skip to content

backport: headless account listing to v2.90.0 - #8

Merged
jack-o-mania merged 6 commits into
releases/v2.90.0from
backports/v2.90.0/headless-accounts
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

jack-o-mania merged 6 commits into
releases/v2.90.0from
backports/v2.90.0/headless-accounts

Conversation

@jack-o-mania

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Backport fork PR fix(codex): list pool accounts without a native home #1's headless account listing to releases/v2.90.0.
  • Carry the fork workflow policy and fork-aware release target gate onto the release line so later backport PRs can target this branch safely.
  • Bump the release line from 2.90.0 to 2.90.1 and retain the source attribution in the backport history.

Verification

  • bun test tests/codex/auth-api/codex-auth-headless-accounts.test.ts tests/ci-workflows/release-version-line.test.ts
  • bun run typecheck
  • bun run privacy:scan
  • git diff --check

This PR targets the fork's versioned release branch as authorized by AGENTS.md; it does not open or target an upstream PR.

Checklist

  • Scope stays focused and avoids unrelated cleanup.
  • Docs or release notes were updated when needed.
  • Security-sensitive changes were reviewed for secrets, auth, and unsafe defaults.

alexalok and others added 5 commits October 28, 2026 15:05
Keep stored ChatGPT pool accounts visible and refreshable when the native Codex home is proven absent. Preserve native identity and reauthentication state without creating a home or relaxing credential-mutation claims.

Validate OpenCodex storage before the missing-home fallback, and surface invalid home-resolution failures. Add isolated regressions for list/refresh routes and synchronize account-list guidance across all published locales.

(cherry picked from commit 4abfcc6)
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-10-29T10:13:58.857278Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
e464250 Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T10:19:58.541314Z e464250 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 28, 2026
@jack-o-mania

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e464250ed2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/enforce-pr-target.yml Resolved
@jack-o-mania

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@jack-o-mania

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Something went wrong. Try again later by commenting “@codex review”.

An unknown error occurred
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e464250ed2

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@jack-o-mania

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Manual review note for exact head e464250ed24865d84c31b8f9f2e360c4501a0df5: the required CI suite is fully green, the security review completed without findings, and the only Codex code-review result was a service failure with no review comment or finding. The backport is limited to the headless account behavior, fork release policy, and the file-size-ratchet formatting fix; no unresolved review thread remains.

@jack-o-mania
jack-o-mania merged commit b876061 into releases/v2.90.0 Oct 29, 2026
30 checks passed
@jack-o-mania
jack-o-mania deleted the backports/v2.90.0/headless-accounts branch October 29, 2026 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants