feat(session): expose LLM response headers on assistant messages#26090
Open
jtbnz wants to merge 1 commit intoanomalyco:devfrom
Open
feat(session): expose LLM response headers on assistant messages#26090jtbnz wants to merge 1 commit intoanomalyco:devfrom
jtbnz wants to merge 1 commit intoanomalyco:devfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks for updating your PR! It now meets our contributing guidelines. 👍 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue for this PR
Closes #26091
Type of change
What does this PR do?
When using a LiteLLM proxy with an auto router, the actual model selected is only in the HTTP response headers (
x-litellm-model-api-base,llm_provider-x-ms-deployment-name). The AI SDK captures these onfinish-stepevents viavalue.response.headers, butprocessor.tsdiscards them.This adds an optional
responseHeadersfield to theAssistantmessage schema and capturesvalue.response.headersin thefinish-stephandler. The pattern already exists forAPIErrorin the same file.Two files changed:
packages/opencode/src/session/message-v2.ts— addedresponseHeaders: Schema.optional(Schema.Record(Schema.String, Schema.String))packages/opencode/src/session/processor.ts— readvalue.response.headerswhen non-empty and store on the assistant messageThe field is optional and messages are stored as JSON, so no migration is needed and existing messages are unaffected. Providers that don't return headers simply won't have the field set.
Example plugin using this: opencode-routed-model
How did you verify your code works?
bun turbo typecheck— all 12 packages passbun test test/session/frompackages/opencode— 296 pass, 0 failx-litellm-model-api-baseandllm_provider-x-ms-deployment-nameheaders appear on the assistant message and are visible to plugins viamessage.updatedbus eventsScreenshots / recordings
Not a UI change.
Checklist