Update schema-41310to41400.sql#3999
Conversation
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please see my drunken comment
|
I love you comments ❤️ don't worry 😉 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@andrijapanicsb a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1108 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@andrijapanicsb a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1110 |
|
Doesn't count from my side - but this one is LGTM after manual testing |
|
for the sake of fun, I don't find the tests needed for this change. @blueorangutan test |
|
@andrijapanicsb a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
this PR looks good, despite travis :( |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@andrijapanicsb a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Looks good, except the description is incomplete 🤦♂ |
* Update schema-41310to41400.sql * update configkey desc
|
Packaging result: ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1123 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@andrijapanicsb a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
Trillian test result (tid-1357)
|
|
Looking good, 2 x LGTMs, manual testing regression testing OK (failed test nothing to do with the PR). Merging. |

Keeping the snapshot on Primary storage only, was originally implemented for KVM+Ceph specifically as it seems, since it's seriously broken for KVM+NFS/local in 4.11+ (and not applicable/doesn't affects VMware at all, while it accidentally works for XS+NFS as they share the same "strategy")
Thus update the desc so that KVM users don't find themselves scratching their head.
We would want to fix/implement this in 4.15 (?) since when using qcow2 the snaps can be kept "attached" to it, the same way they are now attached/part of the rbd image (Ceph)
ping @GabrielBrascher @wido @weizhouapache
cc @nathanejohnson (you guys implemented this, right?)