Skip to content

README: GLM-5.3-Flash Jammed XSFP4 NZ5 in Pick a model - #2981

Merged
ashhart merged 2 commits into
ashhart:mainfrom
Bizuayeu:pr/glm-nz5-docs
Nov 14, 2026
Merged

ashhart merged 2 commits into
ashhart:mainfrom
Bizuayeu:pr/glm-nz5-docs

Conversation

@Bizuayeu

@Bizuayeu Bizuayeu commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What this changes

One row in the README's Pick a model, after GLM-5.3-Flash Jammed XSFP4, and one sentence in the GLM CUDA recipe's opening. #2894 reads NVFP4_NZ5 checkpoints, and Jammed XSFP4 NZ5 is the checkpoint in that form. The row says "on main after 1.2.7", which holds once #2894 is in, so this one lands after it. The row is shorter than its neighbours and leaves the numbers to the card it links.

Checks on this head

  • Head commit: f048007945
  • Lean checker, python3 tools/zig/lean_check.py, on the base and on this head: n/a, the diff is README.md and docs/recipes/glm-5.3-flash-cuda.md, no source. python3 tools/pr_check.py --base origin/main: 2 changed files, lean 345 vs 345, 0 new, 0 errors and 0 warnings.
  • Tests run, with the command and pass, fail and skip counts: n/a, documentation only.
  • CI: on this head, all 12 jobs that ran passed (fmt, zig, zig-windows, zig-macos-dev-tools, pytest, release-paths, both benchmark-clients, desktop, desktop-linux, appimage-linux and mobile); host-nightly-linux and host-nightly-macos were skipped, as they are on pull requests.
  • Not run, and why: the inference checks, as the change cannot reach inference.

Receipt

Checklist

  • The title and description match the head commit, including the receipt and the stack. (f048007945, one commit on main at 000b534a28.)
  • New tests fail before the change, pass after it, and skip cleanly without their dependency. (No tests: documentation only.)
  • Comments and docstrings are one line. No measurements or history in the source. (No source changes; the row keeps a size, as the table's other rows do.)
  • No personal data, machine names, internal hosts or local paths in the diff or its commits. No AI attribution lines. (The diff names the public checkpoint and @Bizuayeu, as the rows already do.)

@ashhart

ashhart commented Nov 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks @Bizuayeu.

The row and the recipe sentence match the card at 1c900ea0: 160.2 GiB of safetensors, and KL, top-1 and NLL all nearer BF16 than Jammed XSFP4, with paired intervals that exclude zero. "on main after 1.2.7 (#2894)" is the same wording Jammed XSFP4's row used before 1.2.3. Once #2894 ships in a release, the row and the recipe sentence can name that version, as #2451 did for Jammed XSFP4. The row stays as short as you meant it to, with the numbers left to the card.

CI is green on f048007945. It merges cleanly with main and with #2894's head 39abe29739. Since the row describes #2894's loader, it lands right after #2894 and not before. When you have your TP=2 serve on main (load time, memory, token hashes), please add it to the description. We won't hold the landing for it.

  • Synthena (Ash's Agent)

@Bizuayeu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

When you have your TP=2 serve on main (load time, memory, token hashes), please add it to the description.

#2981 (comment)

Added to the Receipt, taken on main at 3885dceb2b with #2894's head merged, as #2894 is not in yet: loaded in 109.7s, rank 0's model 83.53 GiB, and the same token_sha256 drafted and with "draft": false on all three prompts. Once #2894 is in, I will serve it again on main.

Bizuayeu and others added 2 commits November 14, 2026 01:24
ashhart#2894 reads NVFP4_NZ5 checkpoints on CUDA. The row lists the one that uses it, after Jammed XSFP4, with its serve at TP=2 and its card's closeness, and the GLM recipe's opening names it beside Jammed XSFP4.
@ashhart
ashhart merged commit 948e748 into ashhart:main Nov 14, 2026
9 of 14 checks passed
@ashhart

ashhart commented Nov 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thank you @Bizuayeu. This is merged into main with your commits under your own name, so you're listed as a TensorFold contributor. It ships in the next release, credited to you in the changelog and the release notes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants