Repository navigation
Conversation
…profile The scanner line said it never executes what it scans. The optional Docker sandbox stage runs skill content, so it now says the scanner never starts an MCP server, executes nothing by default, and that the sandbox runs skill content in isolation. The Policy row says the schema is published and enforced by the pre-release gate, not Live. PiranhaDB is Offline in the component table and in the Threat intelligence row, as the piranha-api README and ecosystem-status.yaml say. Closes #9 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015T9K217kxBqsUZ3omKYv9P Signed-off-by: chaksaray <chaksaray@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #9
What and why
ECO-5. Three claims in the org profile README were wrong or stale:
piranha-apirow) and in the "Threat intelligence" row, as the task note asks. Thepiranha-apiREADME says the hosted API is offline, andecosystem-status.yamlin PR feat: generate the ecosystem status diagram from a status file #8 sets PiranhaDB tooffline.Four lines changed in
profile/README.md.Item 3 of the issue is in PR #8, not here
The issue's third item, replacing the hand-drawn interoperability block with the generated status diagram, is done by PR #8 (ECO-1, issue #7), which has to exist first because it creates the generator. Merge #8 before or together with this PR. If this merges alone, issue #9 closes with item 3 still undone.
Verify (run this session)
Table against
ecosystem-status.yaml(from PR #8), row by row: AVE live, PiranhaDB offline, scanner live, gate pre-release, audit log pre-release, identity/reputation/delegation not built. All seven rows agree. The Policy row has no entry in the status file; it is the one sentence from the runbook.Acceptance
claims/STATUS.md. Not met by this PR. The profile README is clean for C-11. One violation remains inscanner/SECURITY.md:52, in the scanner repository, so C-11 stays FAIL until that line is qualified there. ScannerREADME.md:7was in the earlier list but is not flagged in this run.ecosystem-status.yamlOther rows in this README that I think are stale (not changed)
These are outside the issue, so I left them. Each needs a decision or a separate task.
gaterow: "v1.0 feature-complete, pre-release. Install from source".pip install bawbel-gateworks (claim C-10 PASS) and the version is 0.1.x.bawbel-mcprow: "Read-only, no private-data tools, no egress tools". Gate PR #78 argues this is not so; read it before the row is kept.integrationsandbawbel-mcprows say "Live". The verifier has no claim for either.Not verified