Repository navigation
Remove gateway integration details from README - #256
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Redone the readme Signed-off-by: Marcel G. <dwight@scranton.de>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Redone the readme
Problem and outcome
What user problem, security risk or operational gap does this address? Why this approach?
Scope and links
Related issue/proposal:
Target milestone (if accepted into a release):
Use
Fixes #...for completed work orRefs #...for partial work. Small fixes anddependency updates do not need a duplicate planning issue.
Validation
Delivery
Merging implements the change; it does not publish a versioned release. Link the
release-readiness issue when relevant. Record deferred work and the reason there.
See the planning workflow.