Update dependency bcrypt to v3.1.22 [SECURITY]

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence	Diffend
bcrypt	3.1.21 → 3.1.22					Diff

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2026-33306

Impact

An integer overflow in the Java BCrypt implementation for JRuby can cause zero iterations in the strengthening loop. Impacted applications must be setting the cost to 31 to see this happen.

The JRuby implementation of bcrypt-ruby (BCrypt.java) computes the key-strengthening round count as a signed 32-bit integer. When cost=31 (the maximum allowed by the gem), signed integer overflow causes the round count to become negative, and the strengthening loop executes zero iterations. This collapses bcrypt from 2^31 rounds of exponential key-strengthening to effectively constant-time computation — only the initial EksBlowfish key setup and final 64x encryption phase remain.

The resulting hash looks valid ($2a$31$...) and verifies correctly via checkpw, making the weakness invisible to the application. This issue is triggered only when cost=31 is used or when verifying a $2a$31$ hash.

Patches

This problem has been fixed in version 3.1.22

Workarounds

Set the cost to something less than 31.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[github-actions]

GitLab Pipeline Action

General information

Link to pipeline: https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/2432797894

Status: Passed
Duration: 4 minutes

Job summaries

rspec: [ee]

Coverage report available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/sagittarius/-/jobs/13800066129/artifacts/tmp/coverage/index.html
Test summary available at https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/2432797894/test_report
Finished in 24.82 seconds (files took 13.33 seconds to load)
1333 examples, 0 failures
Line Coverage: 92.64% (4306 / 4648)
[TEST PROF INFO] Time spent in factories: 00:12.802 (40.85% of total time)

rspec: [ce]

Coverage report available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/sagittarius/-/jobs/13800066127/artifacts/tmp/coverage/index.html
Test summary available at https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/2432797894/test_report
Finished in 24.86 seconds (files took 10.7 seconds to load)
1286 examples, 0 failures
Line Coverage: 92.1% (4138 / 4493)
[TEST PROF INFO] Time spent in factories: 00:13.292 (42.66% of total time)

docs:preview

Documentation preview available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/telescopium/-/jobs/13800098043/artifacts/out/index.html

rubocop

735 files inspected, no offenses detected