Skip to content

build(deps): bump jdx/mise-action from 5.2.2 to 5.2.4 - #155

Merged
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/jdx/mise-action-5.2.4
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump jdx/mise-action from 5.2.2 to 5.2.4#155
ThomasK33 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/jdx/mise-action-5.2.4

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps jdx/mise-action from 5.2.2 to 5.2.4.

Release notes

Sourced from jdx/mise-action's releases.

v5.2.4: Reuse cached signed checksums when restoring mise

Jobs that restore mise from the cache no longer have to download its signed checksums from GitHub on every run, so a network failure at that step no longer fails a job that otherwise restored correctly.

Fixed

  • Restoring a cached mise no longer needs a network download of the checksums. The action checks the cached mise binary against the signed SHASUMS256.txt and its .minisig. Before this release it downloaded both files from GitHub on every run, even when the cache restored correctly. When that download failed, for example after repeated curl errors, the job failed. Now, once the signature checks out, the action saves both files as SHASUMS256-<version>.txt and .minisig in <mise_dir>/bin, which is part of the mise cache. On later runs it reads them from the restored cache and checks the minisign signature again before using them. If the files are missing, corrupt or tampered with, the action downloads them as it did before. There are no new inputs. (#708 by @​jdx)
    • Caches saved by earlier versions don't contain these files. The main cache is only saved on a cache miss, so runs keep downloading the checksums until the cache is saved again or its key changes.

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.3...v5.2.4

v5.2.3: Faster cache key computation in large workspaces

The cache key no longer comes from searching the whole workspace for mise config files. In repos that already contain node_modules or vendor/bundle, this removes a delay of several minutes in "Restoring mise cache".

Fixed

  • "Restoring mise cache" no longer takes minutes after installing dependencies. To build the cache key, the action used to match about 25 **/… glob patterns. That meant it walked every subdirectory of the workspace, including node_modules and vendor/bundle, before checking the cache at all. When the action ran after a step like pnpm install or ruby/setup-ruby with bundler-cache: true, this could take 3–7 minutes. The action now looks for mise config files the same way mise does: only in the working directory and each parent directory up to the workspace root. It checks for mise.toml, .mise.toml, .config/mise/…, conf.d fragments, .tool-versions, and their local, env-specific and .lock variants. The step also logs Hashed mise config files in N.Ns. (#703 by @​jdx and @​corsicanec82)
    • If you set a custom cache_key that doesn't use {{file_hash}} or {{default}}, the action no longer hashes config files at all.
    • Config files in subdirectories, such as monorepo sub-projects, no longer affect the cache key. mise only loads them with --monorepo.
    • Cache keys change, so the first run after you upgrade will miss the cache.

New Contributors

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.2...v5.2.3

Changelog

Sourced from jdx/mise-action's changelog.

Changelog

5.2.5 - 2026-10-30

🔍 Other Changes

5.2.4 - 2026-10-27

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • (cache) reuse signed checksums saved with a cached mise (#708) by @​jdx in #708

5.2.3 - 2026-10-24

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • (cache) hash mise config files without walking the workspace (#703) by @​jdx in #703

5.2.2 - 2026-10-21

🐛 Bug Fixes

New Contributors

5.2.1 - 2026-10-19

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • require the signed packslip for mise 2026.9.3 and later (#695) by @​jdx in #695

5.2.0 - 2026-10-16

🚀 Features

  • (cache) rebuild the cache every 30 days by default (#689) by @​jdx in #689
  • (cache) retry throttled cache restores and saves (#692) by @​jdx in #692
  • verify the mise binary against its signed packslip (#693) by @​jdx in #693

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot
build(deps): bump jdx/mise-action from 5.2.2 to 5.2.4
ba8f506 
Bumps [jdx/mise-action](https://github.com/jdx/mise-action) from 5.2.2 to 5.2.4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/jdx/mise-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/jdx/mise-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](jdx/mise-action@8418fed...6be3c7e)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: jdx/mise-action
  dependency-version: 5.2.4
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Nov 2, 2026
@ThomasK33

ThomasK33 commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@codex review

@ThomasK33

ThomasK33 commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-02T22:51:02.878920Z ba8f506 Manual request
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-02T22:51:32.086311Z ba8f506 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: ba8f506ae2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Codex Security Review

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ba8f506ae2

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@ThomasK33
ThomasK33 merged commit f6856e3 into main Nov 2, 2026
3 checks passed
@dependabot
dependabot Bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/jdx/mise-action-5.2.4 branch November 2, 2026 22:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ThomasK33