Skip to content

Baselibs component DFA#2820

Open
aschemmel-tech wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
aschemmel-tech-baselibs-module-dfa
Open

Baselibs component DFA#2820
aschemmel-tech wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
aschemmel-tech-baselibs-module-dfa

Conversation

@aschemmel-tech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refers: #2490

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Docs-as-Code version mismatch detected
Please check the CI build logs for details and align the documentation version with the Bazel dependency.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech force-pushed the aschemmel-tech-baselibs-module-dfa branch from beb4ec1 to 83407d7 Compare April 20, 2026 13:05
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech force-pushed the aschemmel-tech-baselibs-module-dfa branch from 83407d7 to 345de66 Compare April 20, 2026 13:13
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2026 13:35
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech requested a review from a team as a code owner April 20, 2026 13:35
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech requested a review from 4og April 27, 2026 07:27
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to In Progress in BAS - Baselibs FT Apr 27, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@4og 4og left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After syncing with @aschemmel-tech we concluded that DFA should be done per library, so statements like below are misleading.

As the component's archtitecture does not have a decomposition into further components,
there are no failures additional to the ones analyzed on feature level.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: In Progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants