Skip to content

[swift-scheduling] Add new practice exercise - #197

Merged
zeektvbox01-hub merged 1 commit into
exercism:mainfrom
IsaacG:new.swift-scheduling
Oct 13, 2026
Merged

zeektvbox01-hub merged 1 commit into
exercism:mainfrom
IsaacG:new.swift-scheduling

Conversation

@IsaacG

@IsaacG IsaacG commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@IsaacG

IsaacG commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Please ensure all tests pass before merging.

exercism-i18n Bot added a commit to exercism/i18n that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@exercism-i18n

exercism-i18n Bot commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has been translated 🚀

@zeektvbox01-hub
zeektvbox01-hub merged commit 5fdb43b into exercism:main Oct 13, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
@zeektvbox01-hub

zeektvbox01-hub commented Oct 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@IsaacG, the failed check is the old i18n / completeness before the retest

@IsaacG
IsaacG deleted the new.swift-scheduling branch October 13, 2026 11:58
@IsaacG

IsaacG commented Oct 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@IsaacG, the failed check is the old i18n / completeness before the retest

I know. PRs should not be merged until that clears. Please DO NOT merge until ALL checks pass, @zeektvbox01-hub

@zeektvbox01-hub

zeektvbox01-hub commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
image

@IsaacG But i18n / completeness passed later on

@IsaacG

IsaacG commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The initial test should be rerun and cleared. There should be no failed checked when merging. I'm not sure why there the check is duplicated. That may need investigation and fixing. But it should be all green prior to a merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants