Skip to content

feat: add sgf-parsing exercise - #322

Closed
metif12 wants to merge 1 commit into
exercism:mainfrom
metif12:add/sgf-parsing
Closed

metif12 wants to merge 1 commit into
exercism:mainfrom
metif12:add/sgf-parsing

Conversation

@metif12

@metif12 metif12 commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Adds the SGF Parsing practice exercise (difficulty 6), split out of #307.

  • sgf-parsing.v -- stub
  • .meta/example.v -- example solution
  • run_test.v -- 23 tests, built from the canonical data in problem-specifications
  • .meta/config.json, .meta/tests.toml, .docs/
  • config.json -- registers the exercise

Adjustments for the test runner's V version

Parser.expect in the example returns ! rather than !void, because
V 0.4.8 rejects !void and asks for ? instead. ! is the same function
signature on every V version the track supports.

One self-contained commit that touches nothing outside the exercise, so it can be merged on its own.

Verification

  • bin/verify-exercises-in-docker (the current vlang-test-runner image, V 0.4.8): pass, 23/23 tests.
  • V 0.5.2, the version vlang/setup-v installs for bin/test in CI: pass.
  • configlet lint passes; v fmt -l and v vet are clean on the new files.

For the merge commit

Not needed: a brand new exercise does not change the outcome of any existing exercise's tests.

Adds the sgf-parsing practice exercise (difficulty 6), split out of
exercism#307. The example is a recursive-descent parser over the SGF text, with
the escaping of a property value handled by the parser itself.

`Parser.expect` in the example returns `!` rather than `!void`, because
V 0.4.8 -- the version the current test runner image pins -- rejects
`!void` and asks for `?` instead. `!` is the same function signature on
every V version the track supports.

Registers the exercise in config.json. Verified with
bin/verify-exercises-in-docker (the current test runner image) and with
V 0.5.2 for bin/test. configlet lint passes, and v fmt -l / v vet are
clean on the new files.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant