Add support for multiple method modifiers#861
Merged
Conversation
fables-tales
approved these changes
May 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #859
We currently support access modifiers (or any method that takes a
DefNodeas its sole argument) by rendering them inline with the definition, e.g.but we should also support arbitrarily many modifiers. This adds a check to recurse into the arguments of these single calls, and if all the calls are either (a) a
DefNodeor (b) another modifier whose argument is aDefNode, then we also treat those as modifiers. This allows us to do things like