Repository navigation
docs: explain gdp-ts proof producer policies - #86
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
gdp-ts proof factories can be restricted to authorization modules with the new opt-in
gdp-proof-producerrule. DocumentallowedFiles, per-kind ownership throughproofKinds, and graph traversal through aliases and re-exports, including workspace imports and unreachable analyzed files.Explain supported forms, dynamic-label limits, and why upstream lint and TypeScript checks remain necessary. Clarify that
rule-pack testis informational anddead-code --policy-violationsenforces error severity in CI.Validation: content manifest regenerated, documentation checks and whitespace checks pass. Implementation: companion Fallow change is being verified on
feat/gdp-ts-proof-boundaries.