Repository navigation
Fix conversation screens found in real-model QA and explain source scope - #78
Merged
Merged
Conversation
added 2 commits
November 12, 2026 17:55
Real-model checks (Q-90 to Q-93) found seven web problems: a running turn drawn as "no answer", a finished answer left folded, English "Resolve ..." follow-ups, focus lost to the page after a dialog closes, repeated progress lines, a conversation total labelled as one research run, and "no usage recorded" on earlier rounds. The source scope help now says there is no screen yet for granting a task permission, so research can read the source under either scope.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Real-model checks of the conversation screen found seven web problems, and the source scope help described a restriction the app does not apply yet.
Fixed
Source scope help (5 languages): there is no screen yet for granting a task permission, and an unauthenticated local app reads project-owned sources whichever scope is chosen. The help now says so and recommends "Shared within this project". The hosted review environment, which asks for the scope first, shows the same help under the choice.
Web only, no Python changes. Includes the changes of #77; once #77 is merged only the changes above remain.
Validation: tsc -b, eslint, vitest 149 files (1,248 passed, 1 skipped), structure checks, vite build, mutation 19/19 caught. Real-model checks Q-90 to Q-92 passed; Q-93 screen checked with a fake provider response.