Skip to content

[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-78672: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page#16160

Open
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.17from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-14812-to-release-4.17
Open

[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-78672: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page#16160
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.17from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-14812-to-release-4.17

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14812

/assign cajieh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug OCPBUGS-48491 on the Jira server at https://redhat.atlassian.net. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. request failed. Please analyze the request body for more details. Status code: 400: {"errorMessages":[],"errors":{"rankBeforeIssue":"expected Object","rankAfterIssue":"expected Object"}}

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.
/retitle [release-4.17] : Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14812

/assign cajieh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 17, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
  • do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 30c0ef86-df7c-4619-88fc-59e88c1c3bd8

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-48491: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page [release-4.17] : Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page Mar 17, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from Leo6Leo and jhadvig March 17, 2026 13:06
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Mar 17, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@logonoff logonoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Mar 17, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 17, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 17, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: logonoff, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2026
@cajieh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 17, 2026

/retitle [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-78673: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-4.17] : Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-78673: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page Mar 17, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 17, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78673, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.16.z" instead
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78673 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14812

/assign cajieh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@cajieh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 17, 2026

/retitle [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-78672: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-78673: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-78672: Namespace is not persisting when switching to developer view from the topology page of admin page Mar 17, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78672, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78672 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14812

/assign cajieh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@cajieh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 17, 2026

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cajieh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78672, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78672 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@logonoff
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/jira refresh

@cajieh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 22, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-console

1 similar comment
@cajieh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 23, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-console

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 593756f and 2 for PR HEAD a67ac8f in total

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Mar 25, 2026

/retest-required

@cajieh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 26, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-console

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Mar 26, 2026

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Mar 27, 2026

/retest-required

@cajieh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cajieh commented Mar 28, 2026

/test e2e-gcp-console

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Mar 30, 2026

/retest-required

20 similar comments
@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Mar 31, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Mar 31, 2026

/retest-required

@yapei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

yapei commented Apr 1, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 1, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 1, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 2, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 2, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 7, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 7, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 8, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 8, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 9, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 9, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 10, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 13, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 15, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 17, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 20, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 20, 2026

/retest-required

@Leo6Leo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Leo6Leo commented Apr 24, 2026

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 24, 2026

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console a67ac8f link true /test e2e-gcp-console

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. component/core Related to console core functionality jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.