[davidnmbond]

Codacy re-tracked the line 46 finding to the RunGitIn helper, which
starts a literal git with ArgumentList.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	0
Duplication	0

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage	✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (cd3fc8f)	22793	14520	63.70%
Head commit (7713f18)	22796 (+3)	14523 (+3)	63.71% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#207)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

✅ No blocking issues noticed

No blocking findings were identified. The review agents found no requirement gaps, logic issues, or quality concerns requiring changes before merging.

_{TIP Add a Jira or Linear ticket key to the branch or title so the reviewer can check the PR against it. Using another tracker? Tell us.
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}