Repository navigation
[parallel] replace worktank - #132
Open
patrickhousley wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
patrickhousley wants to merge 1 commit into
patrickhousley wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is primarily to resolve fabiospampinato/worktank#5 for the prettier experimental-cli. Rather than fixing in the upstream, there is IMHO negative-value in having a third-party dependency for something as simple as a worker pool (no offense), this PR replaces worktank with a node-native worker pool implementation.
Worktank is isomorphic, working in both node and browser environments. Not a necessary or used feature CLI project. In fact, this was the entire reason fabiospampinato/worktank#5 exists. Worktank serializes the environment and uses a string replace method to inject that into the worker script.