Skip to content

Benchmark sections lead with their bars, and the right TOC stays inside the window - #52

Merged
chrisjleal merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/visual-comparisons-and-toc
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

chrisjleal merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/visual-comparisons-and-toc

Conversation

@chrisjleal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes the layout and visual gaps shown in the screenshots:

  • The four headline cards sit directly under the Benchmark title with no duplicated 77/77 chart above them.
  • The 77/77 PrecisionMemBench bar chart sits inside , right above its source table, and the source column stops repeating three times.
  • now opens on its own bar chart (), comparing Proofable (93.8% stopped, 87.0% tasks done), the unguarded agent (83.6%), and an injection filter (92.0% stopped, 21% tasks done).
  • Every benchmark section opens visually on its bar chart before its prose.
  • and no longer overflow by 3.5rem, so right-hand TOC labels are never clipped at the viewport edge.

…de the window

- The four headline cards sit directly under the Benchmark title with no
  duplicated 77/77 chart above them.
- The 77/77 PrecisionMemBench bar chart sits inside Memory that returns only the
  current fact, right above its source table, and the source column stops
  repeating "TenureHQ, its own code: benchmark table" three times.
- Prompt injection on AgentDojo opens on its own bar chart (stop-agentdojo-*),
  comparing Proofable (93.8% stopped, 87.0% tasks done), the unguarded agent
  (83.6%), and an injection filter (92.0% stopped, 21% tasks done).
- Every benchmark section opens visually on its bar chart before its prose.
- #table-of-contents-layout and #table-of-contents stay inside the 17rem right
  rail instead of overflowing to 20.5rem and clipping labels at 1280px.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chrisjleal
chrisjleal merged commit e4b6492 into main Nov 10, 2026
2 checks passed
@chrisjleal
chrisjleal deleted the docs/visual-comparisons-and-toc branch November 10, 2026 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant