Skip to content

doc: change tools.ietf.org references to official rfc-editor.org, use https#495

Merged
djc merged 1 commit into
rustls:mainfrom
mcr:update-tools-to-rfc-editor
May 23, 2026
Merged

doc: change tools.ietf.org references to official rfc-editor.org, use https#495
djc merged 1 commit into
rustls:mainfrom
mcr:update-tools-to-rfc-editor

Conversation

@mcr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mcr mcr commented May 21, 2026

The tools.ietf.org copy of RFCs was always unofficial, and the IETF would love to get rid of it.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 21, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.01%. Comparing base (0fe5e6c) to head (bf461ba).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #495   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.01%   97.01%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        3950     3950           
=======================================
  Hits         3832     3832           
  Misses        118      118           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@djc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

djc commented May 22, 2026

The tools.ietf.org copy of RFCs was always unofficial, and the IETF would love to get rid of it.

Do you have a reference for this?

@mcr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mcr commented May 22, 2026 via email

@djc djc added this pull request to the merge queue May 23, 2026
@djc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

djc commented May 23, 2026

Thanks!

Merged via the queue into rustls:main with commit db6e920 May 23, 2026
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants