Repository navigation
feat(ops): produce pinned managed runtime candidates - #2288
Merged
Merged
Conversation
knqiufan
requested review from
AlexStocks,
PsiACE,
frostming and
zhanghuidinah
as code owners
October 28, 2026 07:47
This was referenced Oct 28, 2026
hireview001
reviewed
Oct 28, 2026
hireview001
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- CI failed: validate (failure).
- CI failed: Candidate macos-x86_64 (failure).
- CI failed: Candidate windows-x86_64 (failure).
- CI failed: Managed resource candidates (failure). Failed steps: Candidate windows-x86_64 / Produce twice, compare bytes, consume catalog, and run bundled launcher/Ops; Candidate macos-x86_64 / Acquire pinned interpreter and freeze native wheel closure.
- CI failed: E2E harness (failure). Failed steps: validate / Validate harness and Compose definitions.
hidb4ai
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2026
hidb4ai
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed commit 6d5113f. No remaining blocking code findings. The candidate-only production scope is consistent with the existing resource consumers; this adds no database tables or public HTTP/MCP/SDK operations.
Focused producer/resource tests, both lockfile checks (including the harness-pinned uv), lint, formatting and type checks passed locally. Native Windows/macOS checks are still pending and must pass before merge; local Linux checks do not establish native platform acceptance.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue or RFC does this PR close?
Related issue: #2112 — PR 09-C: Managed runtime and Installer/Ops resources.
This PR implements the candidate resource producer and required-platform CI for 09-C. The broader #2112 remains open: 09-A release-candidate assembly, 09-B qualified publication/download verification, and signed/notarized installed-platform evidence under #2108/#2109 remain outstanding. The Windows and Intel native candidate jobs must also pass before this PR's native build claims are accepted.
Local setup parent: #2114. Consumers: #2115 (installer; database admission in #2286) and #2116 (native bridge in #2289).
Rationale for this change
The managed installer and Desktop Ops bridge need complete versioned resources that run without a user's Python, uv, Git or compiler. This producer builds immutable candidate Server and independent Ops resources from exact source, interpreter and wheel identities on Windows x86_64 and macOS arm64/x86_64.
What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?
Maintainers gain resource-production commands and CI. Every output is explicitly an unqualified candidate; there is no publication, inferred production URL, signing, notarization or qualification override. End users do not build dependencies or change global tooling. Windows production measures actual managed final/staging and independent Ops path budgets without enabling global long-path settings.
How was this change tested?
LC_ID_DYLIBfrom actual loaded libraries/search paths; the independent Bub lock mirrors the rootresource-buildgroup without changing any of its 122 package identities or versions.uv lock --project e2e/bub --check --offlinepassed for all 122 packages;make checkpassed. Full harness dependency installation and a task-local uv 0.10.12 acquisition were attempted but stopped during slow downloads; no complete local harness installation or pinned-tool rerun is claimed.make check: passed lock validation, all pre-commit hooks, both type-check scopes and 61 integration-manifest tests.POWERCONTEXT_RESOURCE_TEST_INPUTS=... POWERCONTEXT_RESOURCE_TEST_INPUTS_SHA256=... POWERCONTEXT_RESOURCE_TEST_OUTPUT=... uv run --no-sync pytest -q tests/test_managed_resource_producer.py tests/test_ops_resources.py: 48 passed, 2 Windows-native skips in 237.63s using the actual minimalresource-buildhost environment. Its host does not contain cryptography, jieba or maturin.aedf7beb1ecff2ea1fade6ccdd8e4bf6a298f799, version1.4.2.dev36+gaedf7beb. Evidence records working-tree producer hashes separately andmatches_committed_files=false; this is not a claim that the subsequently committed producer already ran in CI.ba3fefa0478dfa18aa0ece8ff928f9a02da46415d23bda9d676c909b3ac28167; Ops archive:d6171c2e40f84f2da2b44bcc69ff8852dc4a1be4fc207887e7d9cbd4160d3233; Ops manifest:cf707c6fa209dabf5576a0250569aaf7269e71b2b667adb815e66c72b69a2373.AI usage statement
Implemented with Codex using GPT-6.1 Sol, with earlier GPT-6 Luna investigation. The primary agent coordinated integration and final acceptance; GPT-6 Astra independently reviewed the Intel build/bootstrap boundary. Open Code Review remote and delegate modes were used before submission, and confirmed findings were repaired and revalidated.